A minha dúvida é se é aconselhavel numa web dinâmica em asp, alterar as URL's para que pareçam estáticas.
O que tu dizes é sentido comum, mas pensando no rastreamento dos motores de busca, por ex. no google webmasters dizem o seguinte...
Does that mean I should avoid rewriting dynamic URLs at all?That's our recommendation, unless your rewrites are limited to removing unnecessary parameters, or you are very diligent in removing all parameters that could cause problems. If you transform your dynamic URL to make it look static you should be aware that we might not be able to interpret the information correctly in all cases. If you want to serve a static equivalent of your site, you might want to consider transforming the underlying content by serving a replacement which is truly static. One example would be to generate files for all the paths and make them accessible somewhere on your site. However, if you're using URL rewriting (rather than making a copy of the content) to produce static-looking URLs from a dynamic site, you could be doing harm rather than good. Feel free to serve us your standard dynamic URL and we will automatically find the parameters which are unnecessary.
Can you give me an example?If you have a dynamic URL which is in the standard format like foo?key1=value&key2=value2 we recommend that you leave the url unchanged, and Google will determine which parameters can be removed; or you could remove uncessary parameters for your users. Be careful that you only remove parameters which do not matter.
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/dynamic-urls-vs-static-urls.htmlA minha duvida é se devemos seguir ou não seguir estas indicações?
Ab!